Eater Vegas Crosses a Line (twice)

http://www.almancini.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/IMG_2943.jpg
In terms of contempt, Eater Vegas occupies a rung on our ladder of disrespect somewhere between climate change deniers and people who torture their pets in the name of entertainment.

You could even say the web site — driven exclusively by click bait, celebrity sightings and lame-ass, phoned-in infomercials for chefs and eateries — is beneath ridicule, since it never rises above the cut-and-paste-press-release form of food “journalism,” and overuses listicles (and attention-grabbing headlines like “awesome, “epic,” and “must read now”) so much that all adjectives are rendered meaningless.

When Eater decided to launch in Vegas four years ago (three years after this site started), yours truly was approached about combining the two sites, and was briefly excited about the prospect, until our price proved to be too high, and they (Vox Media, the national media company who owns the Eater franchise) decided to go with piecemeal bottom-feeders instead. Thus did a couple of plagiarizing, perfidious hacks get their “jobs” and give Eater what it’s paying for.

When Susan Stapleton (pictured above) first got the job (as local Eater editor), we had a brief and pleasant exchange about my opinions of her employers (low, given how they misled and backdoor’d me in the negotiations), which ended on a pleasant note with her urging me to get back to writing reviews (“we need you,” she said), since I was on a one year hiatus at the time, pursuing my lifelong dream of being a dumbed-down, flash-in-the-pan reality TV star.

I didn’t know the meaning of those words (“We need you.”) until months later, when the true, lazy nature of Eater Vegas became clear. Even then, the site didn’t anger as much as it disappointed me. Instead of raising the food consciousness and conversation level in Vegas, Eater was content to print whatever the hotels and p.r. flacks sent them. Eater Vegas isn’t so much written as much as it is scrapbooked. And just like twelve year old girls, they think putting exclamations and big bold letters on top of something makes it important. Read it carefully, and you’ll see there is always less going on than meets the eye.

But if you do read carefully, you’ll notice neither of them knows anything about food (aside from eating it occasionally), so their reach certainly isn’t exceeding their grasp. This gives comfort (and brings cash) to the Elizabeth Blaus of the world — who go to bed at night knowing that most of Las Vegas’s free media (excepting Heidi Knapp Rinella, yours truly, and a precious few others) will do exactly as they’re told, and never print a discouraging word.

Where it all came together for us was when we realized Eater’s business plan actually depends on such marginal writers to do its bidding at the lowest cost possible. If all your “editor” has to do is browse published articles and regurgitate them, no experience is necessary. Ignorance being cheap bliss, if you will. Even better for those same starving writers, they can cadge free food and booze from the places being covered, and its a win-win-win for everyone….except the reader.

Yes, Eater Vegas “needs” ELV. Badly. Just like any intellectual desert needs water. Just as it needs Desert Companion, Las Vegas Weekly, et al to do its bidding, research and writing. Left to their own devices, neither Stapleton nor Martin could review a ham sandwich.

Realizing that they “needed” my content was one of the reasons I texted Stapleton over a year ago and told her to stop ripping off my stuff. (Our staff is also plenty cheesed about their 38 Esssential Restaurant list – a direct copyright/ trademark infringement of our 50 Essential Restaurant publication, but that’s all we’ll say about that for now.)

As Eater Vegas content continued its downward spiral — “Nick Cage’s Favorite Restaurants!” “What Was Holly Madison Eating at Sugar Factory?” — we decided to let them have it on our various social media platforms. To put it mildly, we have not been subtle or kind…although our tweet: “Eater Vegas couldn’t suck any harder if it were smoking meth in a Tonopah whorehouse” possessed a certain Steinbeckian/Hemingway-esque metaphorical lyricism, don’t you think?

That’s when Bradley Martin – another local Eater employee –  decided to fight back. But he didn’t do it in a manly or grown-up way. He didn’t call me out or engage in a refutation or debate about his know-nothing ode to the lowest common denominator.

No, what he did was try to get me fired from my day job:

Sir:
For the second time, looking for a prompt City Attorney’s Office response regarding John Anthony Curtas, a Deputy City Attorney.

1) At 2.45 p.m. today, Mr. Curtas posted via Facebook:

John Curtas
14 mins • Edited •

Typical of Eater Vegas — trumpet a copy of a copy to keep in the good graces of the p.r. flacks. This is a bad joke….in a food court of all places…and all Caesars Palace did was buy the name off someone….but I expect the free ‘zine freeloaders to be all over it.
https://www.facebook.com/johncurtas?fref=ts

For further background research purposes, it would be helpful if the following could be promptly answered.

1) Is Mr. Curtas a full-time City staff member in his declared position as “Deputy City Attorney with the City of Las Vegas?”
2) What are the working and minimum required hours for the Deputy City Attorney?
2) Was Mr. Curtas employed by the City at 2:45 PM – 23 Dec 2014?
3) Was Mr. Curtas working within City offices at 2:45 PM – 23 Dec 2014?
4) Was Mr. Curtas using a City owned computer at 2:45 PM – 23 Dec 2014?
5) Current policy for Nevada F.O.I. requests regarding City owned computer browser history.
6) Current written policy for staff working second careers while under City employment.
7) The 2014 base pay salary and benefits information for the Deputy City Attorney position.

This following link to an article by Eater Vegas gives some background into the nature of Mr. Curtas’ continued online presence and the impact of his usage of a racial slur in the decision to cancel a proposed television show.

http://vegas.eater.com/2013/7/9/6408567/donezo-put-a-fork-in-all-forked-up-on-the-travel-channel

Further examples of behavior that could possibly be considered offensive, sexist or defaming are available.

At 11.58 a.m. this morning, the following was also posted:

John Curtas

First of all, who is Izzy Aggalea? Secondly, if you don’t want your sex tape released, try not making one.

It would also be helpful if the City Attorney’s Office could provide a written note of support for Mr. Curtas in his role as Deputy City Attorney and his behavior in the private sector.

Eater Vegas is part of Vox Media, one of the country’s largest online publishers with headquarters in Washington, DC and New York, NY.

Thank you for your attention,
Bradley Martin
Contributor
http://vegas.eater.com/

—————————————————————————————————————-

ref. Deputy City Attorney John Anthony Curtas
Bradley Martin <bradleymartineater@gmail.com>

Dec 15 (8 days ago)

to bjerbic
Sir:
Looking for a prompt City Attorney’s Office response regarding John Anthony Curtas, a Deputy City Attorney.

1) At 10.05 a.m. today, Mr. Curtas posted via Twitter:

John Curtas ‏@eatinglasvegas
News flash: If you read #EaterLasVegas, you are beyond hope.
10:05 AM – 15 Dec 2014
ttps://twitter.com/eatinglasvegas

For background research purposes, it would be helpful if the following could be promptly answered.

1) Is Mr. Curtas a full-time City staff member in his declared position as “Deputy City Attorney with the City of Las Vegas?”
2) What are the working and minimum required hours for the Deputy City Attorney?
2) Was Mr. Curtas employed by the City at 10:05 AM – 15 Dec 2014?
3) Was Mr. Curtas working within City offices at 10:05 AM – 15 Dec 2014?
4) Was Mr. Curtas using a City owned computer at 10:05 AM – 15 Dec 2014?
5) Current policy for Nevada F.O.I requests regarding City owned computer browser history.
6) Current written policy for staff working second careers while under City employment.
7) The 2014 base pay salary and benefits information for the Deputy City Attorney position.

This following link to an article by Eater Vegas gives some background into the nature of Mr. Curtas’ continued online presence and the impact of his usage of a racial slur in the decision to cancel a proposed television show.

http://vegas.eater.com/2013/7/9/6408567/donezo-put-a-fork-in-all-forked-up-on-the-travel-channel

Further examples of behavior that could possibly be considered offensive, sexist or defaming are available.

At 10 a.m. this morning, the following was also posted:

John Curtas ‏@eatinglasvegas
This just in: All other food writers in #LasVegas don’t have a f*cking clue.
10:00 AM – 15 Dec 2014
It would also be helpful if the City Attorney’s Office could provide a written note of support for Mr. Curtas in his role as Deputy City Attorney and his behavior in the private sector.
Eater Vegas is part of Vox Media, one of the country’s largest online publishers with headquarters in Washington, DC and New York, NY.

Thank you for your attention,
Bradley Martin
Contributor
http://vegas.eater.com/

Bradley Martin is a worm, no doubt, but even that salvo didn’t shake us. (My employer the City of Las Vegas, responded as fully as possible, but failed to provide a “written note of support” as demanded. But they DO continue to pay me every other week. For that we are thankful. Thanks, City of Las Vegas!) And yes, they were/are fully aware that occasionally I tweet, Instagram, and, quelle horreur! Facebook during office hours. Although I promised them I would try to keep it to a minimum.

Martin’s mental midget missives were a dick move positively Dick Nixon-eon in their dickishness, but we decided to shrug it off and not to engage any further someone with that much time on their hands.

But then, the entire assholiness of these Eater amateurs became obvious.

First, it banned endoedibles.com from commenting on the Eater site — not for profanity or defamation or political rantings — simply because endoedible’s writer (Michael Uzmann) called them out for some of the same things mentioned above (the rumormongering and slavish devotion to sucking p.r. cock being primary among Uzmann’s criticisms).

Then, out of nowhere, and after posting, mentioning and using Uzmann’s reviews (or portions thereof) as content for her site for over two years, Stapleton circulated a letter to every p.r. person she knows, stating “Someone is running around town saying that he writes for Eater. His name is Michael Uzmann, and he does not write for Eater. Never has. Never will. In fact, he is banned from Eater.”

On the subject line of the e-mail, Stapleton wrote: “Scam artist.”

Beyond the untruthfulness and dishonesty behind that statement, its hypocrisy is astounding.

As for its falsity, I’ve gotten to know Uzmann over the past year, dined with him several times and never once seen him misrepresent himself or try to “get” any special consideration from a restaurant. (I’ve been around Stapleton a number of times too, and cannot say the same about her.) If he ever stated to a chef or restaurateur that Eater featured his writings, he would be well within his rights, since that is what they do…without compensation to, or permission from, the writer.

Uzmann is a medical doctor. A real one. With an M.D. and everything. He earns a good living. He doesn’t need Eater Vegas; Eater Vegas needs him. It needs all of us, from the lowliest p.r. functionary to the few actual food writers who do the leg work, and ingest the calories and type away at midnight in their underwear to finish a real article about food….whether for some skinflint publisher who’s paying you peanuts (been there, done that), or for free because you love the subject.

Look at it this way: the denigration of restaurant writing has been well-documented over the past decade. What YELP has done is reduce reviews to a mass mob democracy — with all of the benefits and burdens that imposes on the consumer. What Eater Vegas does is more insidious. It is the professional franchising of know-nothingness and rumor-milled, spoon-fed vacuity disguised as insider information.

It is the US magazine of internet restaurant information.

In other words, it is perfect for the Las Vegas food scene.

With just the right people running it.

21 thoughts on “Eater Vegas Crosses a Line (twice)

  1. Yowsers. That’s a strong epithet here in SLC.

    Thanks for sharing, not that I spend anytime on Eater. Scum does indeed rise to the top. I skim it and dump it when I make stock.

  2. Seriously, you are a public employee? You act like a such a snob, I would have never figured you were a civil servant.

    These are all valid questions that I would like answered. How much time of on the public dime do you spend using social media and this blog?

    Eater Vegas offers some good up to date news about restaurant openings and special events. I don’t care if it lacks in commentary, I used to value your site for commentary until you got too ridiculous. Also you’ve gotten so behind the curve on the best spots. Congrats on finding Jinju after most people knew about it for almost a year and it took you long enough to find out about Omae.

  3. The claim that they are part of a major media company is just ridiculous.

    I remember at some point in my lower school we had to clip, using scissors, news articles that were of significance in our developing minds. We then pasted on a board and brought to school to present.
    My project looked much better than the webpage of “Eater”?

    I have never heard of a responsible publication running around concerning them selves with duties or hours of others .
    Would not have looked at it this site had it not come up but can not believe anyone takes this piece of trash seriously.

    Am sending in a job application as am sure my “sixth grade cut and paste skill” will provide me with a sustainable income; may be way over qualified.

    I could easily do the page they hang out for view and still do my regular work, but not on my employers’ money . Could get it done sitting in a bar at one of the local dives during Happy Hour.

  4. Correction

    I did not mean on John’s employer’s money, which he did not do, but I meant on the money this lady receives for putting together the LAS version of this rag. As far as I know those of us that are professional can work excess hours as long as we get the job done and not be compensated extra and likewise have freedom to spend some “off duty” time during normal hours.
    Anyone that is professional understands this but just re read my take and realized it might come of wrong and not as intended.
    Also she needs a larger spoon as she can not seem to get a full meal with one spoonful.

  5. 3 points:
    #1) In response to “AM” – John Visited Omae early on, I was there, I wrote about it while he waited for return visits to do so.

    #2) In response to John – I actually did allow Susan to use my blog. Requested she do so, actually, to give some added depth to ‘week in reviews’ above the typical media shills. I also OFFERED to write legitimate articles for eater, to add some relevant maps (bakeries, much like those in LA,) and gave her plenty of ‘first’ tips – I did this FOR FREE and offered to write FOR FREE as I did in my article to Vegas2LA regarding Yardbird. I don’t need the money, but am happy to support businesses and people I respect. At all turns, she refused.

    #3) Susan admittedly hates the local reviewers, hates ‘writing’ week in reviews, and does indeed ‘write’ her own pieces for various other local publications, as noted by Steven above.

  6. I don’t care if John works for the City of Las Vegas, the Dali lama or the Pope as long as he continues to write and report on the local dining available to us paying patrons of this Burg honestly, with passion and humor. These other publications are really just PR arms for hire and I read them with the grain of salt one would of any ad copy or news article where the thrust of the writer or opinion is self aggrandizement or self promotion. At least ELV has provided real insight and dining guidance over the years for those of us who value our dining dollars and recognize that great food is more than a “named” Chef or fancy décor.

  7. I wonder how those Executives over in Washington DC and NYC, your know, from Vox Media, you know, one of the nations largest online publishers – feel about an entry level employee using the Companys credentials to and strong arm City Officials?

  8. wow, #BradleyMartin the contributor is something else, somewhere between the lines of a douche and a cunt. You really hurt his feelings. Whats up with the sex tape though? Is he one of those raging Mike Dobranski/Chum Lee types that are a complete embarrassment to food culture? Trough searchers.

  9. I browse through Eater for openings (which of course are merely press releases, like ELV stated), but that’s it. ELV is where I actually find out about the food.

  10. Interesting. From the Eater code of ethics:

    “Eater Ethics Statement
    by Eater Staff Nov 14, 2014, 12:47p
    SHARE(1) TWEET(1)
    The editorial team of Eater has determined the following statement of ethics which all employees and freelancers agree to abide by.

    CONDUCT

    Eater critics do not accept free dishes or meals from restaurants or their representatives unless they are items given to other patrons or regulars. If a conflict exists between a critic and a chef or restaurateur (be it friendly or otherwise) the critic will recuse himself from reviewing that restaurant or very clearly disclose the conflict. Eater critics will not attend media dinners, press previews, or friends and family meals. Eater critics will strive for anonymity when reviewing restaurants, meaning they will make reservations under assumed names, avoid posting photos of themselves publicly, and refrain from revealing their identities when introduced to chefs and restaurateurs. Eater critics will not abuse their title to obtain favors, including reservations and choice tables

    Eater editors are permitted to attend media events, press previews, and friends and family meals but will not accept comps during the course of a regular restaurant meal.”

    Also,

    “OTHER EMPLOYMENT

    Employees of Eater may not be otherwise employed by or receive compensation from restaurants and companies that they are likely to cover as part of their news beat, nor are they permitted to have any advisory role (paid or unpaid) at those companies.”

  11. Seems strange that you have a link under “friends In Food” to EaterLA. One is good but the other bad? Maybe there is more that meets the eye or in this case “spoon”.

  12. I’ve been banned from commenting on Eater Vegas for a little more than two years stemming from comments I made that were critical of the site. In one case, they took to posting the full name of the operator of a longtime Vegas travel site and making a point that said person was based in Los Angeles. I called them out on that and pretty much said that they were jealous of said site. Then they tried to post news that was two weeks old and previously reported on another Vegas website as well as a few podcasts and I called them out on it and tossed a few barbs about the site being trumped by yet another non-Vegas based Vegas site.

    Content farms like Eater Vegas as well as Vegas Chatter have long been “borrowing” content from other sites several days after those sites published it and try to pass it off as their own more often then not. They want to be a site’s friend as long as they let them latch onto them like a lamprey, but once a site tries to break it off, these content farms turn on them. Eventually, these folks will burn any and every bridge that’s out there.

  13. In response to Jason, yes, there is a huge difference in the journalistic content of EaterLA, EaterNY, and EaterSF compared to the shitshow going on here – one merely need browse the stories.

  14. agree with Michael. the problem is only rotted here. I follow Eater LA, NY, SF and CHI. eaterhave an amazing platform and the concept is great. but here it’s more like jerry springer material. a shame for such a great food city

  15. I think we can all agree that John is a pompous ass and Eater just a bunch of clueless hacks. Uhockey seems decent though.

  16. As one who had negotiated the hallowed halls of Vegas culinary, the “powers that be”, and the media who cover it inside and out, and once was poked fun of in ELV, always have and especially now appreciate JC’s cutting candor….

  17. Eater may have been the worst purchase Vox made. Unlike Vox.com and TheVerge.com, the Eater empire is an experiment AOL already failed at when trying to cover politics in 2008, making local blogs on topics people care about while paying the authors next to nothing. They found out the content wasn’t worth posting. The only good thing Vox did for Eater was give their interface a much needed face-lift. Eater may be good to find out about the latest beer pairing dinner, but not much else. How many Wahlburger updates do we need?

Comments are closed.